RESIST.

resist
Standard

On Friday, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order targeting Black and Arab immigrants. In a nutshell, the Order: 1) indefinitely barred Syrian refugees from entering the United States; 2) suspended all refugee admissions for 120 days and 3) blocked citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries, refugees or otherwise, from entering the United States for 90 days: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Lawsuits and demonstrations in protest of the Order have broken out all over the country and politicians and athletes alike are speaking out against it. The Order, advertised as a measure to protect the American public from terrorism, neither targets the countries that have produced the most international nor prevents radicalized Americans (the individuals responsible for the most recent, deadly attacks in the US) from executing acts of terrorism. But who’s worried about pesky facts? A few misstatements or alternative facts never hurt anyone, right?

Continue reading

The Place Where Brittney Griner & Baltimore Collide

Standard

As I sat down to write a few words about the Brittney Griner
and Glory Johnson domestic violence arrests, I couldn’t. For once, it wasn’t
writer’s block that inhibited the flow of words.  No, this time I couldn’t write because my
eyes and heart were completely fixated on Baltimore, Maryland and the rage that
streamed across my television screen.  As
I jumped from the TV to Facebook and back again, I thoroughly read and listened
others’ views (and even briefly shared my own) on the protests and riots that
overtook various parts of the city.
While I mulled over the reasons for the violence and people’s reactions,
I was taken back to my first summer in law school.  As a law fellow at the NAACP headquarters, I
got to experience first-hand the two Baltimores: the city of Johns Hopkins, the
Harbor, and the Orioles; and the other city (you know the one fairly accurately
depicted in the Wire), a place filled with poverty, oppression and crime.  I was in the middle of thinking about how the
other Baltimore was being condemned and vilified by so many when it hit me.
Throughout most of this country (and especially within mainstream media), just
like there are two Baltimores, there are two standards for violence.  What’s celebrated or given a mere passing
glance within some groups is condemned and written off as barbaric for others.  After I had that mini-epiphany, I had this
one: The world of sports is no different.

In March when the Dallas Cowboys signed Greg Hardy to a one
year contract worth as much as $13.1 million, the media and the general public
had no problem expressing their disgust with the organization for aligning itself
with someone who they believed had physically abused a woman.  When the public and the media learned that
Adrian Peterson had been accused of abusing his child, they called for his job,
his endorsements and his freedom…all in the name of taking a stand against
domestic violence.  The tone is very
different, however, when female athletes become involved in domestic disputes
that turn violent.  When Hope Solo was
arrested for domestic violence involving her sister and nephew, the
conversation was void of protests and sound bites from No More, and Solo
suffered no real consequences.  When we
learned of Griner and Johnson’s arrests, reports sprung up about the complexity
of domestic violence within the LBGT community and many questioned if the WNBA’s
code of conduct would even be an issue.  Where
was the clear demarcation against domestic violence?  And lest we think this is just a gender
issue, the country is about to tune in while Floyd Mayweather, a convicted
abuser, fights to make up to $180 million in his bout against Manny Pacquiao
this weekend.  His history of abusing and
threatening women is not in question; yet he continues to be celebrated
throughout this country for his talent and wealth.  Apparently, some people just get a pass.  

The mixed reactions to violence among athletes are the same
mixed reactions that are being used by the media and public to characterize the
riots in Baltimore.   When the Boston Tea
Party served as a catalyst to push the colonies towards the American
Revolution, the participants were celebrated as pioneers and champions of
freedom.  When the United States bombed
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the violence was condoned in the name of
democracy.  The protesters of the Arab
Spring became the Time Person of Year.
Police officers gun down unarmed people and it’s all protected in the name
of law and order.  But, the second that violence
and unrest erupt in the poor streets of Baltimore in the name of Freddy Gray
and as a result of poverty, oppression, fear, and anger; the protesters are
characterized as thugs and animals, a disgrace to their race and country.  Why the discrepancy?  

The root of the mixed reactions can be pointed to a lot of
things, namely, racism, sexism, classism, and capitalism, to name a few.  But the fact of the matter is that violence,
no matter who perpetuates it, no matter the justification, no matter the
target, really is not ok.  If we learned
and promoted across the board that all human life had value, that the way to
express opposing views is not through violence, that it is not acceptable to
impose your will on others through force, then maybe we wouldn’t have to have
these discussions about people rioting and looting.  Maybe we wouldn’t have to have partnerships
with the NFL and No More.  Instead, these
mixed reactions send clear messages to the world that violence for some is ok.  If the mentality is that violence in some
circumstances will be celebrated and acknowledged, then we’ll always have
people who attempt to be a part of the group that has their violence
justified.  That only creates more
violence.  America’s history of violence,
especially towards its Black citizens, is long and well-documented, and until
America’s rhetoric and actions becomes one of nonviolence across the board,
violence will continue.